Vamos limitar o WIP dessa pandemia!

Sarajevo Special Scrum.org Product Owner Training

  

Studies* show that certain memories help us learn and remember more effectively. Combine a course with a team building exercise, an appraised movie, and you have something amazing - a training with lasting impact. 

This is exactly what we wanted to achieve with the first Bosnia Agile organised Scrum.org Product Owner training.

The PSPO (link) training was build around two events, the Sarajevo Film Festival  and a rafting team building exercise. It does not come as a surprise that this event was sold out 6 weeks ahead.

 

Between watching a great movie 'The Railway Man' and rafting in this beautiful region, the students where also learning everything important about Scrum, value, lean and agile product ownership. Since I was the trainer it might sound pretentious from me to say how awesome this training was, but in all modesty, it truly was. It was an outstanding and new experience not just for myself. I made many friends and shared many great moments with my fellow students. I am sure that Sarajevo played a big part in this. Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina, is a very dynamic and friendly city surrounded by beautiful nature and with good reason was the host for the ’84 Winter Olympics. I for myself cannot wait to go there again.

25 happy Product Owners and a happy trainer cannot be wrong. We have been so pleased that the organisers and I decided to repeat this setup once again next year.

If you live somewhere in the EU you should consider combining education with worthwhile memories. More training content will stick and even better, you will have more fun learning. Consider this: even with budgeting in the costs of transportation and accommodation, it is probably still cheaper than your near-by training provider.

See you next year at the 21st Sarajevo Film Festival …

 

*)

http://brainbasedteaching.wikispaces.com/file/view/Caine+114.pdf

http://pratclif.com/brain/neurons.htm

Retrospective activity (filtering) : Most Likes and Dislikes

cross posted on FunRetrospectives.com

This is a follow-up on the Plus Minus Voting activity. It creates a visual tool for the marked items according to its total score (from the lowest to the highest).

Running the activity
1. Create an axis as per the figure below (<- -="" minus="" plus="" zero="">).
2. Ask the participants to place the marked post-its (from the Plus Minus activity) on the axis as per their total score (e.g., 4 + and 1 – have a score of 3).

3. Discuss with the group about the items.
Note that the items with + and – on it represent items in which the participants have different opinions.
I find this activity specially useful for cleaning up the canvas. The post-it with most votes are picked up and moved to a new place. By doing this, the participants are naturally filtering out the notes. Some colleagues have added an extra dimension (an Y axis) for counting the total number of votes (picture below).

Leading vs. Lagging Indicators OR Futurospective vs. Retrospective Activities

Cross posted on www.caroli.org

Floyd Marinescu on his Culture and Happiness in Virtual team presentation at the QConSP 2014 conference brought a very interesting point to my attention.

Make sure to track and meet weekly to talk about your team leading and lagging indicators.

Leading indicators are metrics about the future and upcoming events. Lagging indicators are metrics collected based on the past events and happenings.

I watched his talk a little after I had given my latest talk about retrospectives. Naturally I related his points to my retrospective world.

Traditional retrospectives activities are looking at the past. Typically, these are more interested on the lagging indicators. On the other hand, futurospectives activities are for preparing for the upcoming future. Therefore these are more interested on leading indicators.

Floyd had another precious advice: To focus on the leading indicators, trying to keep these green (visual representation of the good status). Good status for leading indicators will usually support good results which are/will be shown in the lagging indicators.

I also had the same experience as a project leader and a retrospective facilitator. By running futurospectives (responding to leading indicators) you might end up with better results which will appear on your retrospectives (lagging indicators).

My advice: Teams should consider alternating retrospective and futurospective activities. And make sure to keep doing it on a weekly basis.

Half-Life of commitments

Half-life is the amount of time required for a quantity to fall to half its value as measured at the beginning of the time period. 

During private PSF (Profession Scrum Foundation) classes my students create a Change Backlog. The idea of this backlog is to codify the things that need to be changed in order to become agile. Actually, after they finished creating the backlog I ask them to put a name on each sticky note, meaning that the person whose name is on the note is responsible for acting on that item and is accountable for it. Finally, I ask them right away to define a date at which they will review this backlog. Inspect and Adapt.

I am doing this to avoid the training conundrum ‘Yeah, this has all been very interesting but right now I don’t have the time and right situation at hand …'

In my opinion if you don’t go out immediately after the training and walk the talk, your motivation will decrease rather dramatically. Not that I have researched, but my feeling tells me that the half-life is about one week. So, after two weeks your motivation is down to a quarter.

Also, I see best results when whole teams get a company private class. Even better when their superiors join in too, if not for the entire training but for the last 3 hours of the second day when we create the Change Backlog. This exercise creates a transparency which hardly can be reproduced in a later setting. At the end of day two, most of my students are really enthusiastic to get started and the managers sense this as well. 

High chances of success: An enthusiastic team with management support: you are ready to roll on your path to agility.

Fun Retrospective workshop at Agile2014

Are you going to be at Orlando (July 28 – Aug 1) for the Agile2014 conference? If yes, Please check out our proposal (Taina TC Caetano and I,  Paulo Caroli) at https://submissions.agilealliance.org/sessions/1751 and leave a comment/review letting us know what you think. See you there!

Come, learn and practice two dozen of simple yet very effective Retrospectives´ activities and ideas. In this session, you will take part on performing proven retrospectives activities that help agile improve this practice execution and results. This session’s dynamics has been designed to provide you with hands-on facilitation, group discussion and experience sharing.

Retrospectives improve communication, productivity and quality by providing a space to support knowledge and experience sharing. Effective retrospectives not only reflect upon the past, but also allow the participants to discuss the future and be proactive, instead of reactive.

You will be invited to facilitate a set of activities, such as the Role Expectations Matrix and the General Behavior Activity for team building. We will discuss and show ways of diversifying retrospectives, such as the Peaks and Valleys Timeline Activity, the Happiness Radar -> Lessons Learned Sequence and the Speed Car - Abyss Activity. Finally, for those looking to increase their toolset of activities to look ahead, there will be activities such as Path to Nirvana and Plan of Action. And much more! Please check out FunRetrospectives.com for a quick taste on the activities... (more at the conference submission system)

Project team accelerator at Agile USA 2014

Are you going to be at Orlando (July 28 – Aug 1) for the Agile2014 conference? If yes, check out this innovative proposal by  Rafael Prikladnicki and I (Paulo Caroli)  and leave a comment/review letting us know what you think. See you there!

Join this open conversation about our experience on creating an accelerator of project teams called Software Kaizen. With the goal of forming and training high performing software development teams and accelerating the learning of agile methods, the Software Kaizen accelerator was created based on agile and business incubators concepts…. (you can find more at the submission system).

The Antibiotics of Software Engineering - Agile Testing

Surgery is not a recent invention, it dates back millennia. 

Notable Milestones in Surgical History (http://surgery.about.com/od/surgeryinthemedia/a/HistoryOfSurgeryTimeline.htm)

6,500 B.C.E. - Skulls found in France show signs of a rudimentary surgery called trepanation, which involves drilling a hole in the skull.

1540 C.E. - English barbers and surgeons unite to form The United Barber-Surgeons Company. These barber-surgeons performed tooth extractions and blood letting. Physicians were considered an entirely different profession, treating illness with medications.

1818 - First transfusion of human blood.

1843 - First hysterectomy performed, in England.

1843 - First use of ether.

1867 - British surgeon Joseph Lister publishes Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery, extolling the virtues of cleanliness in surgery. The mortality rate for surgical patients immediately falls.

1885 - First successful appendectomy performed, in Iowa.

1890s - Widespread use of chemical agents to minimize germs. Carbolic acid was put on incisions to minimize germs and decrease infection rates.

1896 - First successful heart surgery performed, in Germany. Surgeons repaired a stab wound in the muscle of the right ventricle.

1905 - First successful cornea transplant.

1917 - First documented plastic surgery performed, on a burned English sailor.

1928 - Antibiotics discovered.

…

Even if the procedure was successful, often the patient suffered and usually died of subsequent infections. 

Also, not to ignore is the discovery of Ingnaz Semmelweis, a physician at a Vienna hospital. While working at a Vienna hospital in 1847 he discovered that far more women died after childbirth by the so called childbed fever in the medical ward then in the midwifes ward. Semmelweis postulated the presence and spreading of germs causing the illness by doctors. Even though, after applying a chlorine and lemon based hand-wash solution the death rate could be reduced from ~35% to 1%, he was being labeled a heretic by the doctors. Ignaz Semmelweis was ignored until Louis Pasteur confirmed the germ theory.

Now, after it was accepted that germs caused infections and that hygiene was mandatory for good outcomes it became also obvious that there was a need to have a treatment once an infection set in. As listed above, on September 3rd  in 1928 Alexendar Flemming discovered the antibiotic effect of Penecillin and transformed medicine as we know it. Nowadays, antibiotics are used to treat all kinds of infections and antibiotics are prescribed in a preventive manner for many medical procedures. 

In software development we are able to develop rather fast and make significant changes to existing systems quickly. However, after these procedures the system often falls sick, suffering from bugs, side-effects and other ailments. I like to consider these as infections. Those infections even arise after well planned and executed engineering efforts.

The fundamental question is, how can we cope with them or even better avoid them - what is the the antibiotic equivalent in programming?

For me, the answer is: Agile Testing

Agile Testing is the process to validate that new functionality performs correctly and more importantly to verify that the existing behavior has not changed - that no infection has set in.

1. We have proof that the current system is healthy before the procedure starts

2. We are able to monitor the systems health during the procedure

3. We can intervene the moment side effects set in

4. We have proof that the procedure was successful 

A well done Agile Testing strategy is the equivalent to clean medical equipment and antibiotics. 

The 1000 Students Challenge (4)

In May of 2011 I was able to run my first Pay It Forward Scrum Training at the University of Bern in Switzerland. I had blogged about this event here:  The 1000 Students Challenge

Last week-end I had the third run at the University of Applied Sciences (HS-AlbSig) in Albstadt, Germany. 20 students volunteered their week-ends to learn about Scrum by attending the Scrum.org Professional Scrum Master Training or short PSM. The class was an even mixture of Master and Bachelor students. It's been great fun for them and myself and it is good to know that 20 future and current IT specialists will join the workforce pre-equipped with Agile and Scrum.

A big thanks to the Hochschule Albstadt for being supportive and to Kunt Kliem for organizing.

My mission is to train 1000 students in Scrum - 918 more to go ...

PS If you are interested in hosting such an event at your institution please contact me at www.effectiveagile.com

One week inception workshop – Porto Alegre Oct 2013

Please find below a few photos from the One Week Inception workshop at Porto Alegre on October 2013.

Here is the presentation (and reference guide for the activities).

Andre Faria wrote a great blog post (in Portuguese) about the One Week Inception AgileBRazil 2013 session.

More links:

• Energizer: Zip Zap Zoom 
• Collaborative Product Vision activity 
• Back to the basics: What made this Agile Inception especial?

Note to self:

•  A full day workshop will be even better than half day
•   Rename Day 4 activity from Flow and Estimation to Estimation and User Journey
•  Keep Doing: no presentation; whiteboard and hands on instead
•   Keep Doing: refer to past Inceptions and projects, but select one of the participants project to incept on
• Pair up with TC Caetano and Mauricio Sanchez for the next one

Thank you!

Cynefin - Making sense of complexity

In my trainings, I’ve been using the Cynfin framework which was developed by Dave Snowden in 1999 while he was working for IBM, for a long time.

It really helps to describe the significant distinction between ordered and unorded - when a defined process works and when to use an empirical approach i.e Scrum.

So, I’ve been looking forward to listen to Dave Snowden first hand at the 5th LAS (Lean Agile Scrum) conference in Zürich last week.

Snowden is a great speaker with lots of insights and british humor. However, each sentence counts and it is loaded with information and very technical terms. As of know I am still digesting his talk.

For exactly that reason, I decided to summarize my take aways and share it for you and myself:

If you don’t understand you cannot adapt - If it works just keep doing it; however what to do if it stops working. Then you are out of your depth and since you did not understand it in the first instance you cannot effectively cope with it

Cookbook - Everyone can cook with a cookbook given the right kitchen with the right tools and all ingredients are available. However, if you lack tools or ingredients you need a ‘chef’ someone who understand the theory and knows the practice. By that time the cookbook is useless to the novice.

Consciousness is a distributed function - the brain, nervous system, hormonal system, … all have an impact in how we work. Consciousness is what a knowledge worker works with.

Body of Knowledge - BoK requires theory and practice. You need the theory and 2-3 years of practice (nervous system) to acquire the skills. Apprenticeship and serving time is key. Theory and practice combined are called praxis. Praxis makes perfect.

Exaptation - using something for something else - far more successful then adaption. Exaptation requires granular elements for recombination. Adaption causes slow change; exaptation is a far more successful strategy for innovation.

Architecture in Software - needs to allow for exaptation. Fairly fine grained objects, good scaffolding allow for free interaction and combination. Software development is a service based provision.

Taking a linear process and drawing it as a circle doesn’t make it non-linear (ditto not faster) - Scrum-er-Fall

Coherence - not perfect data but usable, semantically meaningful. Often we have to make decisions on data which is coherent but not absolute.

People make decisions based on ingrained patterns on past experience - whatever data available, it will be filtered by past experiences.

Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) cannot be eliminated - we have to manage the non-linear causal dependencies and resulting turbulence in unordered systems.

Meaning exists between the gaps of people, not the people themselves - it is the interaction what counts, the relationship between is more important then the things themselves. Don’t change the person, change the way they interact. Manage networks, the vague gaps between things

Agents are anything that reacts within/withon a system - people, ideas, groups, myth

In the Simple domain - agents are fully controlled

In the Chaos domain - no constraints on the agents, wisdom of the crowds; chaotic system have value but they are complicated to create 

In the Complex domain - beneficial coherence through boundary management and attractors. We manage the emergence. (Emergence requires less resources then other processes). You can only understand it while interacting with it.

The Simple domain is adjacent to the Chaos domain - If an unordered problem is approached in a Simple fashion it  will transition straight to Chaos through an catastrophic event.

We like order, like to conform

The more bureaucracy the more informal networks in an enterprise

Hindsight doesn’t lead to foresight

Stupidity and Intelligence with Deception are the same thing.